Teams chats segregated into personal and meeting chats

Anonymous
2025-04-01T14:54:09+00:00

the person to person chats and meeting chats are now appearing under different tabs under Chat. I want to revert to the old way where all chats were in the same tab and not further segregated. Please help.

Microsoft Teams | Microsoft Teams for business | Chats | Other

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

44 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2025-06-18T10:21:06+00:00

    Allow me to add my voice to the multitude that are telling you that this change is a backwards step for usability in teams. I now need to check for IMs in two places rather than one. This is not acceptable.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2025-06-16T09:11:28+00:00

    thanks, your rage post has brightened my day, and i'm now listening to Offspring.

    hope you feel better 🤘

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2025-06-09T22:59:34+00:00

    Thank you for this work around!

    This is one of the dumbest changes seen in a while. Typical Microsoft response takes 7 paragraphs to say "Sorry, no going back". I'm not opposed to making an option to split, but keep the default combined view as an option.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2025-06-04T11:53:16+00:00

    Agree: "Very disappointed with MS's constant and needless tinkering."

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2025-05-22T19:10:59+00:00

    Agreed 100% this change is a complete negative. To not have the option to combine chats and meeting chat, but simply force us to try to navigate is absurd and shows a complete lack of understanding of how people use this product.

    Was this answer helpful?

    2 people found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments