Conversations involving multiple participants, allowing collaboration and information sharing in Teams
We need folders or categories to organize chats, seriously
This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
I'd like to group chats together, not people.
I know this has been asked before, but the solution provided is not working anymore.
I get both personal chat messages and group chats chat messages from several hundred people and would like to categorize them to find, e.g. all messages from a certain group. I found that I can make Contact Groups, which means I can group several contacts into one group, but I cannot add "group chats" to such a contact group. How do I do this? thanks.
Conversations involving multiple participants, allowing collaboration and information sharing in Teams
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
We need folders or categories to organize chats, seriously
I've also desperately been looking for a solution on this front. Because I'm involved in many projects, I have too many chats and I would love if one of the next features would be to create folders for chats. Hide/Unhide, marking as read and unread doesn't cut it for my use, unfortunately.
SPECIFICALLY THIS! My organization is forcing us over to Teams from Mattermost and man oh man...... we hate it. I had everyone organized by what team they were on within our organization so I could easily find and categorize everyone. This is impossible on Teams. PLEASE add this functionality already, it has to be one of the top requested additions easily. It's insane this has yet to be implemented.
Yes, this is definitely a feature that I need. Just having Pinned and Recent isn't cutting it any longer.
I would like to group individual chats into logical groups -> Project X, Project Y, Customer A, Customer B etc.
It doesn't seem like a difficult thing to implement?!