MSN 'Community Guidelines' are INSANE. I can't post, "I am gay". [Among other things] It's considered by these guidelines to be 'hate speech'. How ridiculous. Shame on MSN.
MSN, Community guidelines and standards being inappropriately applied.
Reported
![](data:image/svg+xml, %3Csvg xmlns='http://www.w3.org/2000/svg' height='64' class='font-weight-bold' style='font: 600 30.11764705882353px "SegoeUI", Arial' width='64'%3E%3Ccircle fill='hsl(128, 8%, 22%)' cx='32' cy='32' r='32' /%3E%3Ctext x='50%25' y='55%25' dominant-baseline='middle' text-anchor='middle' fill='%23FFF' %3EA%3C/text%3E%3C/svg%3E)
Anonymous
I have been experiencing issues with posting comments on MSN for the past few months. My comments are often flagged as not complying with the community guidelines, despite my efforts to carefully craft them to avoid offending or accusing anyone. My intention is to provide supplemental information and alternative perspectives on topics and reports. I have also noticed that many news stories on MSN contain inaccurate and false information, and comments are often disabled for these stories. This creates a biased environment on the MSN website, as it does not allow for alternative information to be presented. I believe my comments do not violate the community standards and I would like to be able to resume posting comments like the one below, as sometimes presenting facts and refuting poor ideas is necessary.
“To explore the topic, I recommend looking into the double slit experiment and Schrodinger’s cat. Rather than simply providing answers, it is important to seek understanding by researching and contemplating the materials. Asking for answers is not affective, especially with complex topics like this, as human beings tend to have biases that hinder their ability to seek the reality of the situation due to cognitive dissidence. All I've given you some clues on what to research and I wish you the best of luck in your pursuit of understanding.”
Windows for home | Other | Apps
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
88 answers
Sort by: Oldest
-
Anonymous
2023-06-03T09:18:42+00:00 -
Anonymous
2023-06-09T20:50:10+00:00 Never any explanation of what the violation is. [Mod Removed]. I don't go after people, I am not rude, I Invite adult discussion/dissension. Why are people so afraid of conflicting points of view?
-
Anonymous
2023-06-10T06:41:21+00:00 It has nothing to do with politics. Paranoia is not called for. It is unmonitored bots. Only they could think the word "Sigh" was profanity.
-
Anonymous
2023-06-14T02:40:51+00:00 I have been flagged for violating community guidelines by saying a nut allergy is "life-threatening". Probably the word "threatening". How freaking petty and pathetic are your algorithms that it picks up words and calls it violating when no hate speech, threat, etc. has been used in a comment.
-
Anonymous
2023-06-15T20:55:00+00:00 That is something they really need to deal with. The MSN Bot is flagging LGBTQ+ as hate speech and thus making it vanish as a phrase. This in itself then is a form of Hate speech by MSN where they appear to be trying to make Gay people disappear, if you cannot even mention Gay people as existing, in the middle of Pride well that is pretty dire. Even worse? The Bot has no way to be informed about how badly it is doing on these issues because the link about informing MSN about mistakes?
Does not work
As things stand the truely terrible thing is, the Bot allows for the deliberate Misgendering of people but bans the use of the word Trans, which is why MSN is a haven for Transphobic comments. You can get away with saying some pretty horrific things about the LGBTQ+ community on MSN but you can't even use the terms LGBTQ+. You can be racist but you can't use the term Trans Atlantic Slave trade, but you can make post after post after post trying to claim that it was actually all the fault of the people in Africa for some reason.
MSN's Bot is a great first step in many cases but there needs to be actual humans at some point, I would submit this as criticism somewhere else but, honestly? i'm not sure there is a feedback for the Bot