dasHost.exe is causing udp broadcast flood on 22222 or 10004 ports...

Anonymous
2024-10-16T07:33:40+00:00

Hi i have problem with Device Association Framework Provider Host..

I checked das host is running from right place C:\Windows\System32

Its signed by ms.

How to stop it? It is hundreds broadcast connections per miute..

System is updated, antivirus is working.

Windows for home | Windows 11 | Internet and connectivity

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

61 answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2025-01-08T14:12:25+00:00

    We've also been experiencing this and was observed at multiple sites, hammering our broadcast policers.

    The key have been applied to a couple of test machines and has had the desired affect for us once the machine was rebooted.

    This is only a work around so I've raised it with premier support. This is not a workable product in it's current form and either needs to be officially rolled back or replaced.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2025-01-10T10:07:28+00:00

    Hi,

    Theses port seems to be used by Windows for printer lookup.

    You could reproduce with the button "Add printer"

    Under 24H2 with WPP (Windows protected print mode) enabled, this still using broadcast on port 10004, 22222 and 3289, but not when printing.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2025-01-31T17:42:20+00:00

    Any updates with Premier Support? I'm facing this issue across our network and even after pushing the key through GPO I'm still receiving a ton of broadcast packets.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2025-01-31T17:51:50+00:00

    Not for us. I ended up just sending out a policy to block those outbound packets on the local firewall of the workstations. Its a crappy work around, but microsoft doesnt seem to want to address this issue.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2025-01-31T18:02:27+00:00

    Have you noticed any negative effects from the users? That was my main concern about blocking the packets locally.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments