Help Fix event 642 [SOLVED]

Anonymous
2020-05-29T10:59:28+00:00

Catalog Database (4288,D,12) Catalog Database: The database format feature version 9080 (0x2378) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

Microsoft Windows [Version 10.0.19041.264]

DISM and sfc scan commands are all successful.

Any help on this please?

EDIT: February 2nd 2021

New update kb4598291 and kb4598299 solved this issue!

Windows for home | Windows 10 | Performance and system failures

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

106 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2020-06-20T01:41:27+00:00

    Same here!!

    It seems like 2004 updating installer does not care removing old databases.

    1.

    svchost (5380,D,12) SRUJet: The database format feature version 9080 (0x2378) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

    2.

    DllHost (13392,D,12) Microsoft.Windows.Search_cw5n1h2txyewy_NOEDP_LEGACY_IDB: The database format feature version 9080 (0x2378) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

    3.

    Catalog Database (5356,D,12) Catalog Database: The database format feature version 9080 (0x2378) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

    4.

    Video.UI (13944,D,2) {683991B8-B0DA-4553-854D-58E57BDF4A14}: The database format feature version 9180 (0x23dc) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

    5.

    SearchIndexer (8860,D,22) Windows: The database format feature version 9120 (0x23a0) could not be used due to the current database format 1568.20.0, controlled by the parameter 0x410022D8 (8920 | JET_efvAllowHigherPersistedFormat).

    I've been having the same experience since updating 2004 update.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2020-06-18T21:49:07+00:00

    Update.  ESENT errors remain but two rounds of MS patches and my resource usage is under much better control..

    ESENT errors still continue however.  Cannot find resolution yet.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2020-06-18T18:59:21+00:00

    I see the same problem with upgrade.  I'm running the "sfc /scannow" command to see if it fixes it.  I resolved a bit of the slowness by changing some settings using "fsutil behavior" only because I'm using an SSD hard drive (I don't recommend this change for normal spin up drives).  I've set  "DisableDeleteNotify" to Enabled, "DisableLastAccess" to1, and "MemoryUsage" to 2 and noticed vast improvements on speed. Good luck!

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2020-06-15T04:38:09+00:00

    Install Veeam Agent for Windows. Its free and creates Win10 image restores that are reliable!

    I am getting these ESENT errors on Win81 as well, so its not just a Win10 issue.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2020-06-14T14:48:58+00:00

    I have this issue too - it is preventing macrium reflect from backing up my PC

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments