I have been perusing the tech journals, and noticing that Microsoft seems to be pushing the testing back on the Insider, and will undoubtedly employ "go slow/slow-ring" QC on future updates. The point missed, however, is this: Feature Updates, however regular
(monthly, quarterly, semi-annually), are just that: Features, not core O/S functionality patches. My vote would be to make the "optionality" of FUs (or in this case set the 'FU bar' lower ;) a leetle more visible, for those IT admins who lack time for full
"Insider" regression testing every six months. Going to this extreme shouldn't be a Reg Hack or even a System Center Configuration Manager push to the enterprise to slow the flow of Feature Updates (up to 365 days).
Also, speaking for rural folks that get their internet from a dish and are metered or throttled every six months during download of a 4 GB OS "pull" by several unknowing machines in the household, it is a very real imposition, even if I don't lose any data,
to watch the latest "Better Call Saul" in jerky Low Def.
If they must be mandatory, clearly just setting a bit flag for severity amongst "Insiders" will not be a silver bullet, and use of the "free resource" of Insiders by Microsoft may be a concept worth reconsidering. Let's face it: This isn't the first time
in Microsoft history that a "cool feature" ended up causing a whole lot of bad days for IT pros and end users alike!