After installation of KB4056892 boot failure, after roll-back error 0x800f0845

Anonymous
2018-01-04T22:13:27+00:00

Hi,

I have older AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Asus MB, after installation of KB4056892 the system doesn't boot, it only shows the Windows logo without animation and nothing more. After several failed boots it do roll-back then it shows error 0x800f0845. Unfortunately, it seems it's not easy to disable the automatic updates without gpedit tweaks, so it tries installing and rolling-back the update over and over. The sfc /scannow shows no problem, in-place upgrade also doesn't seem to help. I can try full reinstall, but I doubt it will change anything. It seems like the update is binary incompatible with my old CPU. I understand that making the machine unbootable is the best protection from remote exploitation, but I would rather have the OS working. Especially if my CPU is not vulnerable to the Meltdown attack and the MS mitigation attempts for Spectre is more than questionable. I could find only some German and Italian people reporting the same issue (well the CPU is quite pre-historic and the KB update is very fresh), but no info / acknowledgment from the MS so far. I have Czech localization. Could anybody provide more information?

Windows for home | Windows 10 | Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

494 answers

Sort by: Newest
  1. Anonymous
    2018-01-18T22:35:12+00:00

    I'm working with an older AMD system that is unbootable (logo with not animation).  If I don't have any restore points to roll back to, how can I install the new, fixed update?

    you will need to use a Windows 10 installation in DVD o USB Pendrive to repair Windows from there using the raparation tools.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2018-01-18T22:32:04+00:00

    Update on my progress for AMD Athlon 64 x 2........SUCCESS! 

    After downloading KB4073290 from the Microsoft Update Catalog website and running the downloaded file to install it using the Windows Standalone Installer, my AMD system updated and re-booted to build 16299.194. I ran wushowhide.diagcab and saw that KB4056892 had been removed from hidden updates. 

    The update KB4073290 worked fine and my AMD Athlon 64 x 2 system is back to normal.

    Hope this info might help someone else.

    Thanks,

    Ron

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2018-01-18T22:07:09+00:00

    I'm working with an older AMD system that is unbootable (logo with not animation).  If I don't have any restore points to roll back to, how can I install the new, fixed update?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2018-01-18T21:37:42+00:00

    MELERIX

    Success!  It's a wonderful thing!

    • Downloaded and installed KB4073291.
    • System Rebooted with no problem.  Twice to be sure.
    • Set network adapters to Un-metered.
    • Checked for updates and received Defender update.
    • Two additional checks for updates show no updates required.
    • KB4056892 still shows as failed in update history.
    • Show/Hide tool shows no updates blocked.  KB4056892 was blocked and now it's gone.
    • Looking with Show/Hide there is no mention of KB4056892.
    • " :) "

    It appears that KB4073291 cleans up any "bookkeeping" mess for  updates.  I appears this battle is won.

    Thanks for clearing that up.  The documentation for KB4073291 was not all that clear.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2018-01-18T21:04:19+00:00

    I agree -- it solved the problem with my Sempron 3200+ processor machine, plus took care of the other issue of CBS.log filling up my disk.

    I did have to download and install KB4073291 manually...the "Windows Update" tool did not

    find it.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments