After installation of KB4056892 boot failure, after roll-back error 0x800f0845

Anonymous
2018-01-04T22:13:27+00:00

Hi,

I have older AMD Athlon 64 X2 6000+, Asus MB, after installation of KB4056892 the system doesn't boot, it only shows the Windows logo without animation and nothing more. After several failed boots it do roll-back then it shows error 0x800f0845. Unfortunately, it seems it's not easy to disable the automatic updates without gpedit tweaks, so it tries installing and rolling-back the update over and over. The sfc /scannow shows no problem, in-place upgrade also doesn't seem to help. I can try full reinstall, but I doubt it will change anything. It seems like the update is binary incompatible with my old CPU. I understand that making the machine unbootable is the best protection from remote exploitation, but I would rather have the OS working. Especially if my CPU is not vulnerable to the Meltdown attack and the MS mitigation attempts for Spectre is more than questionable. I could find only some German and Italian people reporting the same issue (well the CPU is quite pre-historic and the KB update is very fresh), but no info / acknowledgment from the MS so far. I have Czech localization. Could anybody provide more information?

Windows for home | Windows 10 | Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

494 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
  1. Anonymous
    2018-01-12T12:58:54+00:00

    Different suggestions work for different machines.

    I should have quoted the interesting part.

    The poster offers a way to uninstall the offending update in a system already compromised.

    If you can boot into your recovery environment and open a command prompt, you can follow its instruction starting from 3).

    3)  At the command prompt - first determine what drive letter your boot volume is assigned.  On mine, it was E:.  It will likely be C: D: or E:.  You might find that do a c: - then doing dir - hitting enter or d: - dir - enter - will be easiest to figure out which drive it is.  You could also go into diskpart and look at the Volumes (diskpart (enter) - list volumes (enter) )

    4)  Substitute the correct drive letter in each of these commands (where e:\ is your Windows volume)

    dism /image:e:\ /get-packages

    5)  After you run this command - it will show a list of packages.  Look for the most recently installed - it likely will say "Install Pending"

    6)  Take that Package identity from those results and run the following command (where package name is the package you want to remove):

    dism /image:e:\ /remove-package /packagename:Package_for_RollupFix~31bf385ad364e35~amd64~~15063.850.1.10

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2018-01-12T08:46:24+00:00

    Thanks Valdemar_Klausenburg_III for the information about AMD's prospective updates and a bit of history on AMD's performance, or lack of in 2007.

    Just as a bit of feedback  on the wushowhide.diagcab utility. It did not work for me as it saw other pending updates except KB4056892

    I am going to stop all updates on my BU AMD system until some further resolution is developed. Not ideal but needs must.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2018-01-11T19:44:29+00:00

    Sumit Dhiman2 ' s post on January 11, 2018

    Even after the updates reset, if the update somehow sneaks in, the best way would be to use the troubleshooter tool.

    Yes, the update does download and install even after running the reset script, for me the reset only wiped out my update history and the history was not restored even after a successful System Restore.

    I recommend using Windows Update Show / Hide (wushowhide.diagcab) to hide the update as this is the only solution that works for me.

    I'm a little perplexed why the update still downloads and installs even though Microsoft says KB4056892 is ........... Microsoft has temporarily paused sending the following Windows operating system updates to this subset of older AMD processors:

    https://support.microsoft.com/en-in/help/4073707/windows-os-security-update-block-for-some-amd-based-devices

    Any thoughts on why my system keeps getting KB4056892 which prevents reboot???

    Thanks,

    Ron

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2018-01-11T14:57:15+00:00

    While I have plenty of workstations to test this ((JoeReedy's post ->"But appears to not be a problem."), I am kinda busy recovering lost systems.  I saw 2 systems relocked yesterday, before updates could be stopped..

    "To prevent this issue, Microsoft will temporarily pause Windows OS updates to devices with impacted AMD processors at this time."

    That statement was released on the 8th, but systems were still being locked yesterday the 10th.

    My approach is to wait for the resolution, if any will come.

    In the meantime I have Hidden the update in the pc at risk.

    Deactivating the Virtualization support in the BIOS, on some pc has permitted a normal boot.

    After you have managed to successfully Hide the update, you can reactivate it.

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2018-01-11T14:20:40+00:00

    I got this error on PC full of accountant softwares and certificates which meant I cant reinstall windows that easy. System restore was corrupted so that wasnt a solution.

    Solution I did is that I took out HDD out of AMD pc and connected it on different Intel PC.

    Booted up there without any issues removed/disabled updates and put back disk to AMD pc.

    Worked perfect.

    Thanks ZoranJonjic . Did not think of trying that but will if my saved image fails.

    Thanks again

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments