Hi AO,
The problem here is could be and possibly, I am an engineer by training with a background in material testing. There are no IFs or MAYBEs in a specification for an engineering part.
I get the feeling that Microsoft plonk in a piece of code someone thinks should work and testing limited to a clean install enviorment. I know it is not possible to test each upgrade against every possible variance in software installation but when it comes to drivers I would at least expect a specific report relating to that failure, or any other failure. But that is not the case, no request for the logs or driver list. Do you realise that I spent 9 hours playing with changes of the WiFi Card and rerunning the update simply on a maybe! THIS IS BUMBLING ABOUT LOOKING FOR A POSSIBLE CAUSE AND NOT AN ANALITICAL APPROACH and that is what is wrong, you never get to prove the problem and make allowance for next time.
I note the size of the install has been reduced slightly, what I also do not understand is the fact that used once UPDATE files are retained without a requested need (ie. for another PC). MY CLEAN INSTALL ON A NEWLY MADE PARTITION PRODUCED FOR SPACE FROM OTHER PARTITIONS RESULTED IN 46GB OF OLD WINDOWS.
Was the problem I had just one of space for 1709 to store OLD WINDOWS because I only had 50GB spare and the accumulation of OLD and the space for 1709 exceeded that?