The statics are clear about the obvious fact that android is the current dominant market player in smartphone OS end user sales with 85.9% market share.
The statics are also clear that, in 2007, when Android launched their system, Symbian and RIM enjoyed a combined market share of more than 70%....
Now, please answer the question:-
Why did Android go ahead to launch their system, despite having NIL in smartphone OS market...?
What market metrics, if not technical, do you have that makes it unviable for Microsoft to relaunch their system at a time like now when their market share is way above NIL...?
Please exercise decorum and avoid foul language.
This is not a political discussion.
Over to you Engineer.....