Absolutely agree w/ and00r's statements.
While there are many in North America that can drop $50,000 every couple of years for a new vehicle, there is most certainly, a greater number who cannot. I firmly fall within the latter group, and have found the old MSN Auto a godsend with regards to
buyer research.
The most important part of my decision tree is reliability. The year-by-year listing that MSN used to provide was an excellent tool. I learned for example, to avoid 2004-2008 Ford 5.4L F150's and their $1000+ spark plug replacement.
Having been made aware of a potential problem, as a buyer, I can either offer the seller less money than their asking price, or demand to see a dealer receipt showing the problem has been corrected, or simply choose a different brand/model/year/engine variant.
MSN reliability allowed a diligent researcher to become a bit less ignorant. That's a good thing !!
The current MSN auto is nothing to me. It's just a glossy magazine advertisement, all flash, no substance.
I was a frequent user of the Msn auto reliability. I buy mostly used car and really like the fact that the reliability info came from repair shops the folks that actually know which models they see all the time. Site saved me from buying an 03 Honda Accord
with the 6cyl. And countless other supposedly good cars that were reliability nighmares.
I wonder if Microsoft took the time to see what the site users thought about killing that info? Far too often it seems companies make decisions to change what they think is for the better and end up losing what was good along with users and customers. I
HONESTLY HAVE NO REASON TO USE MSN.COM NOW!
I have to compile the same data I got from MSN using my mechanic, JD Powers, Edmunds, an buying the Consumer Reports yearly Used Car guide. Decisions like that are why Microsoft is becoming less relevant in the computing and internet content world. Good
Luck with windows phone in an android, ios world.