Having trawled the web to find a solution this morning, I've had a good read through the various tos and fros and don't think I'll be repeating what anyone else has said (apologies if I am of course). Some context - I'm as close as my small office (6 users)
gets to IT Support and last week I had a couple of users complaining that their screens "looked wrong" on certain software. Nothing I could see had changed in any settings so I left it as a glitch that would probably right itself. This morning I had a proper
look and discovered a post on Superuser.com with a link here. I've now changed the default font on our sales software to fix the "looks wrong" problem and am contemplating tweaking the CSS on our company website so it forces the use of Verdana or Tahoma or
similar on any potentially affected visitors. Anyway, my points:
Firstly, on balance I can see the lesser of two evils view of this. It's a potentially very serious vulnerability and, on balance, I'm going to leave the update installed and just tweak the affected PCs (all running Vista SP2 apart from mine which is 64bit
Win7 and unaffected). Easy for me though; I only have 5 PC's to sort out, I wouldn't want to be a bigger company.
Secondly, the posting of potential problems in the KB description is all very well but it's a bit like possible side effects of medicine. If you read the notes for either properly you would never take a single pill or install a single update ever again.
Thirdly, none of my users could have read them anyway (even if they understood them) because these updates went on automatically (as recommended by MS) on shutdown Tuesday evening. What is the point of the warnings when the default, "safer" option means
that you will never see those warnings?
Finally, and apologies if I am missing something really obvious here, wouldn't it be easier to rewrite the coding for the three affected fonts so that they no longer look like a badly adjusted dot matrix and offer them for download?