A quick update to our Community of Disgruntled Users: I have been in touch with Financial Times's Customer Service team. I have suggested to them that, with relatively little work on their side, they can upgrade
their current portfolio manager to emulate all of the functions that we've come to know and love in the dearly Departed MSN Portfolio Manager. FT has offered to call me to discuss my ideas in real time, and I'm hoping to schedule this call for some time this
week. I'll keep you posted on developments.
I would urge *all* of you to contact the Financial Times. If we can show them sufficient demand, they will quickly see the cost-benefit of taking Microsoft's place as the best-of-breed portfolio manager on the
Internet.
By the way, I have also urged FT to consider running a news article on the recent fiasco here in Microsoft Money-land. I've pitched them that such an article would appeal to many people who either manage their own investments,
are interested in Microsoft's activities, or both. If you agree with my line of thinking, I would urge each of you to reach out to FT and express your interest in such an article. Again, if they see high demand, the chances improve that they'll follow up
on this issue. Some public exposure might be the only thing that can possibly move Microsoft to address our concerns.
As I've expressed in numerous earlier posts, I would very much prefer to discuss my concerns with Microsoft rather than with FT. But Microsoft has been consistently unresponsive, and to date they have failed/refused
to engage with us. I renew my sincere appeal to Microsoft management: If you're listening, PLEASE either disinter the beloved Portfolio Manager, or, at least, explain to us why you can't/won't do so.