What exactly does KB2952664 do?

Anonymous
2014-04-27T00:12:24+00:00

KB2952664 was published on April 22, 2014 and appears in my Windows Update List (I am running Windows 7 Pro - 64 bit).

The description of this update is vague:  "This update helps Microsoft make improvements to the current operating system in order to ease the upgrade experience to the latest version of Windows."

Anyone have more information on what this update actually does? If its sole purpose is to ease the "upgrade" from Windows 7 to Windows 8 (or 8.1 or 8.1 update), then I'll just permanently hide KB2952664 (I have no desire or intention to "upgrade" my Windows 7 system to any flavor of Windows 8).

If its purpose is to ease what would be a true Windows 7 upgrade to a yet-to-be-announced Windows 7 SP2, then I'll keep it (but still would like to have more information about what KB2952664 actually does before installing).

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

412 answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2016-04-09T18:52:25+00:00

    >My two cents is if anyone does not understand the windows update settings options and refuse to alter them according to what they want should not be surprised if win-10 is installing in front of their face one day :)

    What about the millions of Microsoft customers who are not computer savvy? They do not understand windows update settings (or even where to find them) .... and many of them do not want Windows 10. Why should they find that Windows 10 is installing in front of their face?

    How hard would it be for Microsoft to implement an option that says:

    Do you want Windows 10? Yes? No?

    If the user clicks No .... then Microsoft no longers tries to push a Windows 10 installation to that user.

    >I have yet to see any win-10 related update classified as Important

    Here is a screen shot of the March 2016 updates showing that KB3035583 (which is on your list) has been unhidden and classified as Important ...

    ![](http://fud.community.services.support.microsoft.com/Fud/FileDownloadHandler.ashx?fid=5b90a91a-eac1-4240-afe3-c7de6a1d4251)

    I agree with you ... that there is a long list of updates that either nag the user to install Windows 10, push Windows 10 installation files to the users hard drive, coerce the user into installing Windows 10, or implement Windows 10 type telemetry collection.

    If a user hides any of those updates, Microsoft should honor that and not unhide the update. If Microsoft must re-issue an update that the user has hidden, then during the "Check for Updates", Windows Update should pop up a dialog box that says:  "Update KBxxxxxxx, which is hidden on your computer, has been reissued. Do you want to unhide the update? Yes? No?"

    I understand Microsoft's overwhelming desire to get Windows 10 installed on a billion devices .... Windows 10 is the key to Microsoft's Software-as-a-Service strategy. But I do not agree with the way in which Microsoft is disrespecting their customers.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2016-04-09T19:03:55+00:00

    You or someone has other updates causing that listing to be classified as important which by the way is a main GWX update

    KB2952664

    KB2999226

    KB3035583

    KB3075249

    KB3013531

    KB3021917

    KB3068708

    KB3080149

    KB3123862

    http://www.ghacks.net/2015/04/17/how-to-remove-windows-10-upgrade-updates-in-windows-7-and-8/

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2016-04-09T19:07:23+00:00

    The most logical reason is the update settings are off that's all,

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2016-04-09T19:18:25+00:00

    ThrashZone, love your "Kill them all and let god sort them out" attitude but I have to concede the point langware is trying to make.

    My colleagues and I support several hundred Windows users (also some MAC and Linux) in the Baltimore/DC Metro area. Most of these are small to medium-sized businesses many of whom have allowed their users to have admin rights on their machines. This is not an ideal scenario and we have done our best to counsel the business owners that this is not, in the long term, in their best interests, but we can only do what we can do. I'm sure you can see where this is leading.

    We have been getting calls from clients who are panicking because they have been "upgraded" to Windows 10 and they want to know "what happens next." More often than not we have been able to "UPGRADE" their systems back to Windows 7, though there have been a couple of DOA machines. Worse, several clients have found themselves unable to use business-critical applications because they are not supported in Windows 10.

    These are not bad people; the are simply individuals trying to make a living. While I cringe at the thought of so many people using computers who really don't know what they are doing, it is none-the-less the world in which we live. That, and it provides me a means of employment ;).

    And before we go saying "if you don't know how to use it don't touch it" remember, if we apply that same logic to everything the number of people with a valid license to operate a motor vehicle will drop by about 60%.

    Actually, that might not be a bad idea.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2016-04-09T19:39:30+00:00

    It's hard to sympathize with a business or individual that knowingly reserves win-10 or doesn't know how to oversee their business networks :)

    But that is your bread and butter so it's all good but in law ignorance is not a defense and it is pretty clear if the person clicks on Accept instead of Decline on the win-10 terms to fully install win-10 it happens.

    A couple of firings would help staff messing up systems and productivity in a heart beat ;)

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments