Mr. Cornell,
That is not the issue at all. In reading your most recent posts it is clear you have intentionally and categorically ignored factual statements made by other contributors.
I love dissent ; it's how we get to the truth. Your posts have shown an almost arrogant disregard for the truth and it is that which I find objectionable, not the fact that you disagree. You simply choose to ignore the findings of other contributors, the
quotes accurately attributed to Microsoft, and any other evidence that opposes your point of view.
I stand by my accusation of rant because you, sir, are exhibiting a blatant disregard for other points of view; you are simply couching it in terms of "collegial" disagreement. That is not my opinion; it is evidence that exists in this thread.
If you would take the time to read all of my posts you will learn I am not ranting against Microsoft; I am a Microsoft Certified Professional and I am truly saddened by their "we know better than you" attitude in regards to Windows users. I was a Windows
10 Beta tester and I raised some of these concerns during the year-long test phase.
One of my friends has held his MCSE certification for over 20 years; his MCP number is 3 digits long, and like me he is sorely disappointed in the actions being taken by a company with whom he has had a relationship for most of his adult life.
If I choose to ignore/hide an update it is my choice. I may not own the operating system but I do own the hardware on which it is installed. Therefore, I get to decide how that hardware is used, maybe to my own peril, but it
IS my choice. Microsoft's repeated attempts to coerce me into doing something I do not want to do is, at least, ethically dubious in nature.
Dissent is a process by which we share information; it should not be used as a club to beat people into submission