Remember that this poster was given MVP status because he is supposed to volunteer helpful opinions, not tell everyone how they are meant to use their machines. Although we have varied opinions on his opinion, most of them are against his
tone and manner to this subject, which I have to personally say is a little rude and confronting as well as plain bossy (again, my own opinion. Take it or leave it. Don't bother me about it).
And what if we are running Windows RT? If we didn't have that access to the desktop, and we needed to plug in or use a wireless mouse and keyboard on our tablet, to access other computers, how could we possibly even install a non-Windows 8 style variant
of Remote Desktop application onto our tablets/netbooks/[insert device here]?
I use Windows 8.1 (the non-tablet variant) and have issues with the Windows 8 style Chrome interface, not because of Chrome but because of the Window Title Bar. The Windows 8 style Chrome has its own little window manager which is amazing for
myproductivity (and possibly many others), yet if I try to close a window in Chrome, I end up closing Chrome.
I do not even use the taskbar, and the developers have been nice enough to give us an option to disable that, but to force us to use this title bar is a bit ridiculous. When you already have users accustomed to the old Windows 8 environment, without the
desktop enhancements (which I think personally takes away some of the original "vibe" from the Metro design language) it is a bit annoying to have users get used to an entirely new way of dealing with windows. We do not even have the option to permanently
keep the title bar shown! How is this supposed to mimic the old desktop style in any way? It gets in the way more so with it being hidden than it would either being disabled permanently or being shown permanently.
Correct me if I'm wrong, but all we ask for, and have been asking for, is the option to remove the title bar. What we are
not asking is to remove it from the Windows environment completely. And as was stated before: if another program can do these actions as "tweaks" we need to pay for, how come Microsoft aren't willing to add a single option to allow a certain
target population to work about 10% more productively (which, in a high stress fast paced environment can mean a huge difference between meeting a deadline or having to redesign their approach to their work).
Like I said, let me know if what I have said isn't completely true so I can change my judgement based on that.