My 2005 Dell desktop running XP is having issues, and I'm thinking about a newer PC but want to run XP. I dont have the install discs (it's stored on the PC), so I would have to get those - XP PRO seems to be required if you want to run Windows Virtual
PC on Win7/8... unless other brands of Virtual programs will run earlier XP versions?
So I'm wondering what's the best way to run XP on newer PCs that typically have Win7 or 8 pre-installed. I'd prefer not wipe out the original OS, even though they take up space. I would imagine it would work best on a separate partition...? I dont want to get
into a 2nd HDD.
I've read that there wont be XP drivers for newer PCs, so compatibility sounds like an issue.
Here's my questions and exploration of the options. Brief answers (yes, no, wrong, etc) would be helpful since I won't understand too detailed explanations.
Does XP work better in 1) XP Mode, 2) as a Virtual PC, or 3) on separate partition?
The advantage of the first is you dont need XP install discs, and it seems to be easily accessible. Disadvantage is you dont get the XP appearance, and it's only available on Win7 Pro and up.
The advantage of Windows Virtual PC is you can load XP (Pro only) on Win7 Home and up (unlike XP Mode that requires Win7 Pro), BUT you need the XP Pro install discs.
Can you use another brand Virtual PC on Win7 or 8 and use any XP version instead of XP Pro?
Advantage of separate partitions is you are actually running XP and getting XP window, rather than Virtual version. Can you load ANY XP version? Is this faster than using XP in Virtual PC?
Disadvantage is you have to install programs twice if you want both OS to use it.
Major disadvantage is it seems XP cannot be installed on pre-loaded Win7 or Win8.
http://windows.microsoft.com/en-us/windows7/install-more-than-one-operating-system-multiboot
I noticed that Win7, and programs in general, work really fast on my 2011 PC (6 RAM, Intel i5). Is that because of the hardware or OS, or both? Would XP work almost as fast?