/Resetbase will prevent the user from uninstalling all previous updates:
Yes. That is the controversy that Marek Kusmierski's script started. The thing is though that his script had more people saying that they had success than for the MS one. Dog Tamer also mentioned this in a later summary of the current state of technique before those original threads were locked, indicating that it looked as if it was necessary to get -355 installed, at least without an ISO as a resource.
I still read the DISM documentation and wonder where's the problem: the document, my interpretation of it, or the program being documented? <eg>