Totally agree. Microsoft has become increasingly less user-friendly. In the desperate corporate marathon to keep up with Chinese, slave-labor made Apple products, MS has attempted to copy them, but usually manages to replicate all the wrong features AND
always at the expense of customer access to basic components. For example, Windows 8 did away with the All Programs feature, easily and conveniently accessible, in favor of charms and indecipherable (for me) iconography. I preferred the nice, easy-to-read
lists of Win 7. But, that's just me.
I place a lot of the blame on of stupid, unnecessary interface mutations on sales and departmental heads who are often clueless (and couldn't care less) about customer preferences. The other major problem with Windows is its isolated, developmental team
approach. Programmers are assigned sections, and sections often have no idea what their adjoining cubicle mates are doing. In fact, it has been told to me by a Microsoft engineer that NO SINGLE PERSON understands completely how Windows works. But this is also
due to the millions of lines of coding (C++) involved as much as it is Microsoft's design, coding and lack of integrative production model.
Gates has never been a people person: He might be a very nice guy--but he's so clearly a nerd that his grasp of human interaction--let alone human-machine interface--is shall we say still at level 0. The obfuscating and entirely unnecessary and useless,
arcane error messages, the stilted programmer's language of Windows's ersatz 'help' screens, the highly exploitable and unsafe Internet Explorer. Just a few of the many examples.
Buy an Apple