Sorry Mike Hall. I appreciate your desire to lower resource requirements of the OS, but the performance fear is generally unfounded. Modern hardware is WAY more than capable of aero glass with negligible impact on anything. My 8 year old laptop, which was
low end when I bought it with a Pentium M and Intel integrated graphics, ran aero glass without a hitch. Modern PCs are also orders of magnitude more powerful than they were in 2006 when Vista launched. It's been 8 years. I haven't seen a PC ship with less
than 4GB of ram in years. Even the lowest end Dell home models ship with 8GB of ram. (http://www.dell.com/us/p/inspiron-3847-desktop/pd?ref=PD_Family).
To claim that it requires a $10,000 PC to have nice graphics in the OS is rediculous and absurd. We're not playing Crysis 3 at max settings, we're providing a relatively simple guassian blur filter.
On top of all of this, we're requesting a feature that could be turned off since it was featured in Vista. Do you have an issue with unchecking a checkbox in the personalization control panel? It's literally a 3 second task to disable and never see again
(and does not use any of those extra resources) while provided thousands of people with a feature they want.
MS would be as bad as the apple troglodytes if they did not listen to the coalface users. Bring back Aero Glass with W10 or continue to loose those of us on the cusp that detest fruit products but need smooth edges and the transparent look as we are on our
devices for many hours both at work and at home.
Many hours looking at the 2013 office trial was enough for me; I deleted it and went back to 2010, a far superior product for long term users.
Barry