Why would Microsoft remove the beautiful Aero Glass effect and replace it with flat colors and cheesy translucency?

Anonymous
2012-11-29T07:30:29+00:00

No Aero Glass is an absolute deal breaker for me.  There is no way I'm installing those ugly flat windows on my desktop.  The transparency that is there which lacks blurring is an ugly joke.  On a scale from one to ten of how upset I am over this... I'm like 1000000000 seriously considering buying a Mac out of pure out-of-my-mind crazy spite.  I cannot even express in words how upset I am over this.  There is absolutely zero chance that I will ever install Windows 8 or Blue or any another Windows operating system onto my computer until Aero Glass is returned or something more beautiful is included.

I am not developing a single app for Windows until Glass is added back.  For my next phone... I was considering Windows Phone 8.  I even stopped by and played with one at Verizon the other day.  No glass?  I'm not wasting my time looking for mods.  Windows Blue is going to be very sad, because I am ditching Windows permanently if glass is not added back, like now, like before I have to spend a single additional second trying to find workarounds on the internet.  Yep.  I can feel an Android Phone in my future, and a sudden love for Java, which I currently hate, coming on.  Feels like the incredible .NET is being abandoned too.  Guess I better go submit my resume to Google.

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Email and communications

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments

75 answers

Sort by: Most helpful
Most helpful Newest Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2014-01-20T09:28:37+00:00

    I think you do not remember Windows 3.11 as well as you think you might.  :-)

    I actually installed it in a VM the other day for nostalgia's sake and...  Wow that's difficult to navigate when you have gotten used to the modern Windows interfaces.  It's not even the look, really - it is the functionality.

    As for this flexibility with Windows, it's still there, you just aren't getting the built-in choices you 'want' necessarily.  There are third party solutions (as there have always been) to make your "desktop" look like you want...

    As for Apple's GUIs - I saw the last change they did to their iPads...  That really 'flattened' things out, in my opinion.  I don't know why everyone moved from the bubbly/rounded format used for the last decade to a more flat look - but I know I have heard most of the same complaints about the stuff being introduced now as the stuff it replaces.  Aesthetics and taste - different for everyone.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  2. Anonymous
    2014-01-20T02:32:09+00:00

    The diffusion in the Glass borders helped me focus attention on the active window, causing it to pop in "front" of the other windows, along with the beautiful aesthetic. Metro is really a return to the Windows 3.1 Program Manager, and the underlying desktop straight out of Vista/7 Basic, IMO. Who knew that Program Manager would boomerang back at us? The formerly great thing about Windows was the flexibility to use it the way we wanted to, and with Win7 in an elegant and logically executed GUI, versus being drone in Apple's one-trick-at-a-time-pony world, using it the way Apple wants. As Windows becomes less user-friendly and more locked-down in functionality, with a two-dimensional aesthetic using a color palette reminiscent of 4-bit 16 colors , one starts to look to Apple--at least their GUI is tastefully executed.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  3. Anonymous
    2013-11-23T00:32:33+00:00

    Aero has no value for full screen apps or Crysis.

    When it appeared in Vista, few liked it at first because it used up screen space for no good reason.

    Only fully supported video cards could manage Aero. Budget machines with low end integrated video couldn't manage it.

    Screen effects have always taken a sizable toll. Windows 9x was ok with the default task bar, but if it was changed to ANYTHING else, it slowed Win 9x down and would cause the very small amount of screen resource to crash out.

    Windows XP ran very much better in 512mb RAM if the Fisher-Price colours were turned off.

    Screen effects were just one of the reasons why Vista was slow.

    It must be nice to own a $10,000 computer which can handle anything..

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  4. Anonymous
    2013-11-22T14:21:19+00:00

    How dare you say it is bad!

    Really?

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments
  5. Anonymous
    2013-11-22T13:55:57+00:00

    Although beta versions of Windows 8 used an updated version of Aero Glass with a flatter, squared look, Aero Glass is no longer the default theme on Windows 8, as Microsoft developers felt that interface designs imitating natural materials were becoming dated. Instead, the desktop interface incorporates elements of the new Metro design, which uses a flatter look with fewer transparency effects, solid colored window borders (designed to attract more attention to the content of a window), and fewer rounded edges.

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Windows_Aero

     

    Aero Theme is Bad, Disable It

    http://www.petri.co.il/vista_aero_performance_issues.htm

     

    It was  resource intensive for the most part.

    How dare you say it is bad!

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments