Gaye, I don't know & I doubt if we will get told when WLM 2013 hits the Net.
As I send a lot of & receive e-mails with photos in the text with suitable descriptive words , I found that while Outlook 2007 ( & possibly 2010) did not destroy any such e-mails received when sending on, it was the inserting images into text in Outlook that was not as easy as doing it in Thunderbird, that has convinced me that Thunderbird is perfect for me in sending e-mails with imbedded text.
If a User justs wants to send attachments, then WLM is probably fine.
Ron
Ron, I hadn't seen this one. I am FINALLY with you and so glad to see this post because tomorrow I am installing Thunderbird! Thanks for the info! Blessings
Gaye