hi you say: "Microsft does not recommend using a Registry cleaner"
But you recommend Registry software why on earth do you recommend such things but not recommend registry cleaner. There is something wrong there. Microsoft has recommend a lot of registry software in the past why?
If MS recommended a lot of registry SW in the past, can you supply *1* URL that shows MS recommending a registry cleaner on any MS operating system in the past 15 years? Just "1" ... I mean if there was "a lot", you should be able to find 1 URL w/MS recommending
it. If you can't, find even 1, maybe MS hasn't recommended any for quite a while.
The only think MS used to recommend was something to clean up old office software entries -- BUT with the arrival of Office 2000 -- PARTIAL (looking broken because they point to files that don't exist) registry entries have been used by MS's auto-installer
to automatically install pieces of Office Software, *as needed*, so you didn't have to install the whole thing at once. From that point on, MS stopped recommending any registry cleaners. The ONLY registry tuning that has been recommended since then is something
that dumps and restores the entire registry -- but that hasn't been available or recommended, that I know of, since Vista. The benefit of doing that (dump / restore) was to compact your registry -- which is of minimal usefulness on today's computers.
Software publishers don't follow a standard when writing to the registry -- so how can a 3rd party cleaner know what is valid and what is not?
MS had SW interfaces that imposed standards, but most SW publishers wrote
their own and wrote directly to the registry in their own format and have been since Win9x. There has been no way to police such actions -- so there is no way to know what to clean out. There are no ownership tags nor creation dates in the registry.
It's like a dumb'ed down 'FAT32' filesystem -- no user info, and no date info -- only
security descriptors. The registry doesn't have enough info in it to determine what
is valid and what is not.
Your computer sucks due to your poor maintenance and MS's aiding you in keeping it so. That's why 64-bitOS's by default don't allow you to install your own drivers anymore -- and why some processes on win7 are normally not touchable by you -- MS is trying
to create protected parts of the OS to add to stability and security -- and add to the ability to resist tampering and forging/counterfeiting (with rootkit infested versions). It's slow going, since people still want compatibility, AND because a totally protected
OS would make the PC into a "game console" by default (in the sense that you can only run binaries signed by MS)...
An option -- maybe linux?... but it is going in a similar direction under corporate pressure.
Windows in all my years becomes bloated as time goes by. Techies, IT Admins, Hackers, programmers all say the same thing: you should do a complete clean install of Windows every 6 to 9 months. If you don't, you will notice your system gets sluggish. The
Android OS works the same way on smartphones.
Your computer sucks is nothing to do with the user, unless of course the user didn't do a clean reinstall at the required interval.