How to make Windows 7 look like XP

Anonymous
2010-12-31T03:44:28+00:00

We purchased a new laptop for our 73 year old father who was just getting used to Win XP.  He has asked if there is any way to make the interface look and work like XP?  So my question is:  is there any way to make the interface look and work like XP?

Brian

Windows for home | Previous Windows versions | Accessibility

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
@CmdrKeene 90,631 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
2011-01-13T19:43:52+00:00

If you want that same classic mode (the gray toolbars and such), that does exist in Windows 7.  Just right-click your desktop, choose Personalize, then scroll down and click "Windows Classic".


If this solves your issue, click the 'Propose as Answer' link below, and vote as helpful by clicking the green triangle to the lelft. Thanks!

Was this answer helpful?

10+ people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments
Answer accepted by question author
@CmdrKeene 90,631 Reputation points Volunteer Moderator
2010-12-31T14:01:43+00:00

For the most part it already does, because it was built from Windows XP.  For example, all windows still have the familiar _ and X buttons to minimize and close them.  You can also change the taskbar to show the words rather than just icons, or make other changes as you need.  While there's no "XP button", changes like this can get close.

If you are simply wanting the visual style to look like XP without changing any function, you can use a skinning program such as WindowBlinds by StarDock.


If this solves your issue, click the 'Propose as Answer' link below, and vote as helpful by clicking the green triangle to the lelft. Thanks!

Was this answer helpful?

5 people found this answer helpful.
0 comments No comments

46 additional answers

Sort by: Oldest
  1. Anonymous
    2015-02-12T02:37:21+00:00

    Yes I'm an old hand from back in the 286 days too (in fact even before).  MS are a business and do have to keep offering something new, so they can eat lunch this week.  And to give them credit, some of it is a genuine step forward.  Does anyone really miss DOS 3.0 ?  But of course a lot of it is a questionable foray into a new look, just to be new, and what really earns them enemies is when they axe murder perfectly good functionality of their previous products for no discernable intelligent reason.

    Now, the "multiple locations" of documents in Win 7 (and XP too actually) as I understand it isn't really actual copies all over the place.  Rather, they have created "virtual directories" -- a rather convoluted system of real folders masquerading as other somewhat fictitious ones.  This is all done in the name of having "multiple personalities" on one's computer.

    Frankly, it's usually just a big fat pain in the butt.  For home and small business systems, computers are so cheap these days that everybody has their own personal one (maybe several) anyway.  They are de facto mostly "single user" devices.   Then again, in larger networked systems (which includes even some very modest sized offices, schools, etc), a complete server system with Unix style file access control is invariably present.

    One can forgive Microsoft for wanting in on those multi-user commercial systems.  And I see how employees of a company might have personal laptops that they use for work, so there has to be a well structured file permissions and security system that even personal single user computers need to be compatible with.  The good news is that most of that can be worked around when it comes to personal single use computers.   I obtained a 3rd party file manager "XYplorer" for all my routine hard disk access.   I set up my own system of folders and program launch windows all accessed via my desktop.  This all ends up in a path under c:\documents and settings.. just like MS's default user files structure, but it is more easily configured to do what I want and not what MS thinks I should have.

    Windows 7 still has much of that functionality, except for the huge annoyances of its window handling.  As I say, any files that look like they are in two places aren't really duplicated.  There are just multiple levels and paths of access.  And disk space is hardly a consideration anyway these days.

    As for 64 bit, watch out.   Supposedly it is finally making some tried and true old favorite apps fully obsolete, ie. as in refusing to run them.  Seems to me that when systems get "newer" and "more powerful" they should still run the old stuff, and even more easily than they used to.

    As for Windows 8, watch the computer scenes in a movie like "Skyfall".  I think that's the kind of dazzling multi-dimensional experience MS are aiming for.  Trouble is, all I wanted to do was keep my parts list over on the left hand side of my W7 laptop's LCD while the schematic I was drawing stays over on my big outboard monitor.   And when I click on a directory of detail drawings in another window to see which ones I need to reference in my schematic, I don't need that damn folder opening on top of the other ones I'm already using, thank you very much.   Go ahead and sell the cool new virtual universe to all the kiddies.  But leave me my multi-tasking that you got to a pretty good state in XP.  Anyone listening Microsoft?  (I won't hold my breath...)

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2015-03-01T01:40:23+00:00

    Shawn .....  Your answer is TOTALLY BOGUS! .....

         Follow this guys "clicks", and you find NO "Windows Classic" option!

         Making Windows 7 "look like XP" cannot be done without trusting some kiddie geeks fifth party software on your machine.

         Not ME!

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2015-03-01T01:43:48+00:00

    Dav Sand ...........................

         WHAT ..... in the world are you talking about ???????

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments