Excuse me???????? The people that have 16GB of RAM should be getting 'Out of Memory' warnings????? Explain this.
Simple logic dictates that system equipped with large amounts of RAM are so because they make use of it and are operated by power-users, not average joes. These days, give how cheap RAM is average joe thinks it's best to get lots of RAM, but, not being a
power user doesn't know how to configure his system. The message only shows up if there's no Virtual Memory present, thus all RAM would be used up and end up unavailable. With VM (unmanaged size), some background application memory would be dumped to VM and
RAM will be freed, hence the message would not show up, ever.
This is user-oriented OS,
What in the world does that mean??? Every OS has a user.
There are classes of users called, average joes like yourself , and then there are power-users, admins, backup operators, devs etc. Each professional class know its sh*t, while one class doesn't know much, hence they come to the forums to get learned.
Who was talking about using all of one system memory
I have 12GB of virtual memory because I have the page file enabled and there is no way I used even 3/4 or that amount for typical computing.
"No-way" is a term often used by average joe thinking he knows it all. There's is no "no-way", there's always "the possibility that is might". Also you're misleading the point by inserting the "typical computing" and abandoning the term end sentence. Sure
for "typical computing" one won't use that much, but the message pops up when the issue is outside of "typical computing", when the used uses for instance a memory leak plagued application.
So that is your solution for an OS that 'IS WORKING PROPERLY', to disable the page file? This isn't the way Windows 7 was originally intended to run and would amount to a broken OS without a fix. No system engineer would tell anyone to disable the page file to fix a problem.
Well average joe, 1st thing you're blaming me for what I use for myself, it works for me and I can live with it. 2nd don't pretend you know anything about OS admin prospects, cause so far you're embarrassing yourself. 3rd, you have either ADD or your're
a little ignorant troll, this is why:
The part about disabling anything was related to the message that bothers the user and my solution was SPOT ON and probably THE ONLY SOLUTION on this thread that pertains to the**Sublime865****question: "**Just need to *disable* that warning above and any actions Windows takes because of it."
1st mart of the message is my answer had nothing to do with disabling the page file. Try to pay more attention, or if you did but for medical reasons you were not able to grasp its meaning, try to medicate yourself
properly. Read it carefully again, test it out and see if it fixes what "MS" broke.
I don't think ...blah blah blah
Well here's the issue, Richman101, you don't think.
You believe all programs want want kind of memory? You're wrong, thus having a very large page file won't be of any use. SOme programs want FAST MEMORY only, like RAM. One of these applications I can think of the top of my head is 7zip. If you set it up
to use a very large comrpession dictionaly it will requires large amounts of RAM. Even if there is a Virtual Memory of several GB available, but the system has only 1GB of physical memory, 7z will throw an error a say it does not have sufficient RAM. Other
programs work in the same way.
The 2nd part of my comment, about me not using a page file, is just a proof of concept that with a memory manager, I can make use fully of my RAM, never hit the message (topic in question) and still won't crash apps. Of course that is in "typical computing"
to use terms you might know about. On the other hand, if I were to use that 7z that way, I would get warning about it or not being able to use it at all. But this is not a typical scenario.
Having a page file is a user's choice, if he or she can and knows how to manage the computer's resources and not let the default profiles interfere, then a page file is not needed.
Having a page file on the other hand is useful for average joes (no offence to others) when they don't want to be bothered of the inner working of the OS. Let the OS use whatever it has.
I now have 8GB of RAM, an SSD and no page file set. Mostly I use 4 to 5GB and all is stable for the past year.
"You better just crash and close because we don't have enough for you" even though there is plenty of RAM and/or page file space available"
No, average joe, you got it wrong again,
this is another thing entirely. If an application has lot of RAM available (as in the cases of people having 16GB of RAM), but crashes anyway you have to look at what type of application it is. A 32-bit app at best can use no more than 2GB of RAM per
task (.exe in task manager). A 64-bit app has none of these limitation. There are instances of 32-bit applications like that that reach this limit, one being Chrome. If using some extensions and uninterrupted use, one of Chrome.exe's will reach 2GB of RAM
because of memory leaks. This, however, has nothing to do with the overall system RAM usage limit being reached. But as I've said before, if people let the default system profilers get involved, they might get results they don't want to see.