Hello Yaaser,
Thank you for looking at my post. Please, please pay attention to my specific questions as your comments are not specific to my problems. I know how to use briefcase, as I've been doing so since I chose to replace Laplink with it sometime around Windows 95.
Performance, whether a) across a wired network, b) to a removable drive (* GB Kensington thumb drive) or c) to a SATA scondary drive (not C, Not the drive Windows is on, not the drive anything necessary is on, but simply a LAN backup drive) is approximately
the same. Nonetheless since I did pay attention to your response, I did as you asked. It indeed proved that performance is a problem too, though I don't think I had yet asked about that. Performance means nothing if functionality is lacking.
I established a briefcase on my thumb drive:
1) it took 4 minutes after draging my directories to the briefcase for the analysys. This was 7,925 files, 652 folders, 2.95 GB.
2) it took an additional 20 minutes for the "copy windows" to begin showing progress on the analog scale the copy window shows
3) it then took 46 minutes to copy the files from the C drive to the briefcase.
Next it took 49 minutes to copy the same files to the thumb drive using a plane old Windows Expolorer copy
Next it took 4 minutes to open the briefcase
Then it took a couple of seconds to delete 3 files from one of the dirctories and close the directory
Then it took 3 minutes to open the briefcase
Then it took 1 minute to re-establish the deleted files using briefcase.
Having done as you asked, may I ask two questions?
1) Any chance of having my original questions answered?
2) Any interest by MS in making briefcase viable once again?
Your response to my questions would be greatly appreciated,
SW