I don't want to take one side or the other on this issue, but I am curious why some are so adamant about getting rid of the 100 MB Windows 7 system reserved partition.
Setting aside the case made by CaptPat for now and sticking to workstations and home PC's, I agree with Fertz and KJBlake on the space issue. Percentage-wise it's not enough (< 1%) for me to spend time on--especially given the importance of the partition
and effort required to get rid of it. Darius Reager has a different case for needing to remove it. I can't think of any good reason for MS customers to encrypt this hidden partition that contains no user data. Perhaps it's a policy requirement? Sometimes policy
is difficult to change. Of course that doesn't make it correct...
Does it really boil down to some not wanting to change the old way of doing things and/or preferring to manage partitioning and boot files for the sake of retaining control? That's good enough reason IMO, but keep in mind that enhancing support for this
flexibility during install could have a price tag in the millions for a product as big and widely-distributed as Windows. I'd mainly like to know if there are other reasons we might find compelling and just haven't thought of yet.