I would trust TYAN support far more than Microsoft.
thats why im here. the last no speaking English person didnt know they were working for microsoft.
This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
There is a very rare instance that may happen under Windows 7 if you upgrade
your processor from a single to a dual or a dual to a tri or a tri to quad core processor. Under Windows Task manager > Performance tab you may encounter only the previous amount of cores visible even if you have Task Manager > View > CPU history > One Graph per CPU checked off.
This graph pane area which should show the equivalent amount of cores per graph is directly tied into the MSConfig > Boot tab > Advanced options > "Number of Processors" setting. You may not show the correct amount of cores in this MSConfig pull-down.
Let me give an example:
You install Windows 7 with a dual-core processor and have this option checked for "Number of Processors" (in Msconfig > Boot > Advanced options) and the amount set to "2" (for dual core). This setting is not mandatory to be set but some ppl do in order to force Task Manager to show 2 graphs (or 3). One graph for each processor. At a later point in time you upgrade to a Quad-core or Tri-Core processor. The OS will not read this extra core or have anything enabled to physically use this extra core(s) until the following are performed:
NOTE: This will force the OS to reset the count to default for the amount of Cores you now have. There is possibly a boot setting that can be added that I may not be aware of to do this same function but this little applet works and does the same thing. Don't muck around with any other setting in this utility if you don't know what you are doing it may leave your computer unbootable and a complete reinstall or long repair may need to be performed. Just make sure this one setting is set to "0"
Notes: Some of these discrepancies will appear if your OS is reading the incorrect amount of cores.
This is a rare issue, but if you are upgrading CPUs in the future these are a very important steps to enable your Win7 OS to take advantage of this extra core you are buying. Even tho in places like Device Manager it will show the correct amount of cores the MSConfig setting will override the Device Manager only allow you to work with a lessor amount of cores thereby limiting your CPUs true potential preserving your good investment.
Good Luck! I hope someone who encounters this issue finds their way here after a CPU upgrade or they may rip their hair out and I can tell you from experience I was making the Level 3 tech support at Microsoft rip their hair out when I found this issue lol
I was getting an Experience Index value for Processor of 6.3 when this core was disabled and not showing up in Task Manager > Performance tab. Once the above steps were performed my Performance Index jumped to 6.9! My old Dual-Core CPU was an Experience Index of 6.1 to show you the difference a 3rd core can add to your system. In the future, once I start gently Overclocking my new Triple-core processor (once I get a better CPU cooler) It should exceed 7.2-7.4 or greater Experience Index. =)
TCsenter wrote also:
Some recommendations (make sure you are running as Administrator):
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
I would trust TYAN support far more than Microsoft.
thats why im here. the last no speaking English person didnt know they were working for microsoft.
I would trust TYAN support far more than Microsoft.
thats why im here. the last no speaking English person didnt know they were working for microsoft.
Also, one thing I noticed is you said you have "2 dual cores". There is no such thing, you have a quad core not 2 duals.
Ehh...he clearly stated "two dual cores". IOW, he has a dual processor system, each processor having two cores. "two dual cores" Anyone familiar with computers would know that TYAN mostly designs dual and quad socket server motherboards, very few single socket, and would naturally have understood.
The recognition of the quad cores is handled by the OS and I have no idea why you are calling Tyan as they will have no clue what you are even doing if they do not even know the OS Premium supports a quad core processor.
Actually, the BIOS (via ACPI namespace objects or structures) is responsible for the "recognition" of any processors and their logical or physical features such as processing cores. The BIOS exposes these things to the OS, the OS queries the BIOS for them, but no matter. I would trust TYAN support far more than Microsoft.
2 dual cores would still be considered a quad not "2 duals" but this is just a semantic and no sense beating a dead horse, so to speak.
Also, one thing I noticed is you said you have "2 dual cores". There is no such thing, you have a quad core not 2 duals.
Ehh...he clearly stated "two dual cores". IOW, he has a dual processor system, each processor having two cores. "two dual cores" Anyone familiar with computers would know that TYAN mostly designs dual and quad socket server motherboards, very few single socket, and would naturally have understood.
The recognition of the quad cores is handled by the OS and I have no idea why you are calling Tyan as they will have no clue what you are even doing if they do not even know the OS Premium supports a quad core processor.
Actually, the BIOS (via ACPI namespace objects or structures) is responsible for the "recognition" of any processors and their logical or physical features such as processing cores. The BIOS exposes these things to the OS, the OS queries the BIOS for them, but no matter. I would trust TYAN support far more than Microsoft.
This answer has been deleted due to a violation of our Code of Conduct. The answer was manually reported or identified through automated detection before action was taken. Please refer to our Code of Conduct for more information.
Comments have been turned off. Learn more