Follow this link:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/desktopsearch/technicalresources/advquery.mspx
[EDIT: Moved to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa965711(v=vs.85).aspx
]
This should be included in Help and Support.
This browser is no longer supported.
Upgrade to Microsoft Edge to take advantage of the latest features, security updates, and technical support.
Hello,
I am looking for it everywhere but I can't find it.
When in Windows search and you are looking for a file, you can type in *.txt to look for a '.txt' file.
But it seems that the syntax of file name to look seems more complex that it looks first.
For instance, the quote character (") and the equal sign (=) seem to have there own significance.
And I think I have heard that it was possible to use 'not' and 'and ' signs.
Please, where can I find the complete syntax of the search paterns?
Thank you a lot
Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.
Follow this link:
http://www.microsoft.com/windows/products/winfamily/desktopsearch/technicalresources/advquery.mspx
[EDIT: Moved to http://msdn.microsoft.com/en-us/library/aa965711(v=vs.85).aspx
]
This should be included in Help and Support.
On Tue, 19 Mar 2013 13:22:35 +0000, SummerBob wrote:
What I'm looking for, and haven't been able to find it, is a way to search for ONLY files that have a particular extension, even if other files START WITH that extension. For example, I want to find all C# files in a folder and search for *.cs. Windows finds every *.csv file. Not what I want. In Unix you can specify $ (for end of string) or ^ (for beginning of string). You think *.cs$ would give me what I want, but it returns nothing.
Download and install the freeware program Search Everything at
http://www.voidtools.com/ Do a search for *.cs. No $ is necessary.
Search Everything is excellent and very fast.
The fact that I'm looking at FOUR (4) pages of a thread (that arguably should never have been spun to begin with) proves the problem. In a day that the best and brightest are paid the big $ to develop "usability" someone at Microsoft seems to be pining for the days of DOS 2.0. Do you really think my mother is going to get this? She calls ME!!!! Please please please escalate this issue to the top -- let me spend time with my children.
Regards,
Bear
The most helpful reply has hit this on the head, the resource link you have given, Hannes3, is now, like Microsoft, defunct and pointing to windows 8 lawl.
I can not agree more. It is so frustrating!