Clean Install of Windows 11 Ni Preview Build works with Build 22557, but not with 22563, 22567, 22572, 22581, 22593, 25115

Anonymous
2022-03-11T03:48:13+00:00

I created all 5 installation ISO files for all 5 Builds, but only 22557 contains all the system Apps required for a full clean install, the other 4 are missing all the basic Windows and System Apps needed for a functional system. Also, the App required for opening Windows Security (Microsoft.SecHeatlthUI) is missing, all this makes the resulting system unusable.

Last one on 22557.

Microsoft.SecHealthUI Microsoft.SecHealthUI_1000.22557.1.0_x64__8wekyb3d8bbwe

I noticed another issue common to all the Ni builds, if they are used for an upgrade or in-place they may only work correctly if they are done online allowing the check for updates.

If I use the option "Change how Setup download updates" to "Not right now", the upgrade or update in place still completes, but it creates a problem on subsequent W.U.

In this case W.U. goes in a loop trying to Download and Install the same Build over and over. Error 0xc1900401 is logged in that case.

I could not find a way out of that loop.

If I do the same upgrade or update in place online letting the Setup check for updates, as recommended, the process may complete correctly without subsequent W.U. loop issues, but the behavior is inconsistent depending on how the previous update was done.

The official MS Insider ISO 22579 includes all the required Apps and the Microsoft.SecHealthUI which is needed for opening Security.

Windows Insider program | Windows Insider preview | Install, activate, and Windows update

Locked Question. This question was migrated from the Microsoft Support Community. You can vote on whether it's helpful, but you can't add comments or replies or follow the question.

0 comments No comments

232 answers

Sort by: Newest
  1. Anonymous
    2022-04-07T02:11:50+00:00

    Hi Sibro,

    I did an upgrade from 19044.1620 to 22593.1 using a uupdump created ISO and everything worked fine this time,

    Widgets was present in settings right after the upgrade and the icon was in the taskbar with the old format and no hovering,

    It changed to the new format after MS Store updated the WebExperience Pack to the latest version. πŸ˜‰

    Image

    Image

    New style icon with hovering nuisance. 🀣

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  2. Anonymous
    2022-04-07T01:02:26+00:00

    Hi Sibro,

    Looks like with build 22593.1 there is no more delay on mounting an ISO file with File Explorer.

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  3. Anonymous
    2022-04-04T21:31:59+00:00

    Found the link to install Web Experience pack and got the latest level.

    That fixed the Widgets, after a reboot it was working properly.

    Detective fg2001 strikes again! πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

    @Sibro.o,

    Another difference, between Dev and Beta, even if they are at the same Build level 22581.200 right now, they have 2 different versions for the WebExperience Pack:

    Dev:

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_521.20060.315.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    Beta:

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_521.20060.135.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    This below is the old one that does not work and is installed with the uupdump ISO:

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_421.20050.505.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    What makes it even more puzzling is that the same level App is installed with MS official ISO 22579.1, but in that case Widgets work right away after the upgrade.

    Hard to say what else is different that prevents Widgets from working in one case, but not the other?

    Also, the WebExperience is at the same level on a clean install and it works fine in that case. πŸ€·β€β™‚οΈ

    Perhaps because it gets updated right away to this one, before the final update?

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_421.20070.95.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments
  4. Anonymous
    2022-04-04T09:35:37+00:00

    Found the link to install Web Experience pack and got the latest level.

    That fixed the Widgets, after a reboot it was working properly.

    Detective fg2001 strikes again! πŸ‘πŸ‘πŸ‘

    Was this answer helpful?

    0 comments No comments
  5. Anonymous
    2022-04-04T07:46:53+00:00

    Hi Sibro,

    As I said earlier, looks like the level of Widows Web Experience Pack in the ISO is a low version.

    Should be 521.20060.315.0, but what they add in the ISO is 421.20050.505.0

    Found the link to install Web Experience pack and got the latest level.

    That fixed the Widgets, after a reboot it was working properly.

    I think the version included from uupdump is older, also it was not even installed after the upgrade.

    Had to find it on the Web and then install it manually, you cannot find it just searching the MS Store and it does not show on the list of installed Apps either. 😝

    https://www.microsoft.com/store/productId/9MSSGKG348SP

    Image

    Image

    Image

    After fixing the Widgets problem, I updated to 22581.200 with W.U.

    but at this point, since I fixed the issue, I could have used also the ISO 22581.200 from uupdump.

    You will not see the problem upgrading from 22000.593, because the Windows Web Experience Pack is already installed and at the right level.

    It may get updated from the store with the other Apps if needed. It is weird that it is not listed in the installed Apps, I have to use PowerShell to find it.

    This was upgraded from 19044.1620 to 22581.200 and it is on Dev Channel.

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_521.20060.315.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    Curious that I find 2 versions in 2 different machines both working and up to date.

    This was on one upgraded from 22000.593 to 22581.200 and it is on Beta channel.

    MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience MicrosoftWindows.Client.WebExperience_521.20060.135.0_x64__cw5n1h2txyewy

    Image

    Was this answer helpful?

    1 person found this answer helpful.
    0 comments No comments