Guys, I have a $400 Ruckus R500 access point. I have a beastly network storage that can serve two wired computers with 115MB/s simultaneously. Still, when trying to transfer on SP3 WiFi it crawls and I only get 10-15 MB/s when sitting 10 feet away from
the router with line-of-sight. The access point's statistics page for the SP3 reveals it has ridiculous packet error rates. It also betrays that the SP3's driver is reporting an incorrect theoretical link rate, 866 Mbps when it is actually connected at 433
Mbps.
The SP3 has major wifi issues that Microsoft cannot resolve. These Marvell chips are garbage, same as their desktop chips are. Realtek chips even are better than these. I was going to buy an SP4 and give my wife my SP3, and I still really want to, but
I am doubting if it is a good decision when the wifi performance is so poor and I need (and have paid for) better performance.
If the SP4 has a different WiFi chip I'll get it. If not, probably not. There are other good options coming on the market now, whereas when I bought my SP2 and SP3, there were not.
I second that. I really think Marvell is at fault here (see the number of problems there have been from the beginning, some revolving around the fact that when Bluetooth is enabled, WiFi cripples).
This chip has hardware flaws, and drivers are poor. And it is Marvell who produce them.
The fault of Ms here is using those stinky chips.