Hi Dub. I sympathize. The 6/20/16 updates did not solve the problem. And I agree that nothing in this long thread of anecdotes convinces me that the problem is in the hardware or that swapping machines will solve it. The fact that no one has demonstrated
that the same system image behaves differently on different Surfaces (something that would take only a few hours to confirm) should cast doubt on all these anecdotes.
I'm sure Microsoft must be trying to solve this problem. I can only hope it's a priority. It's certainly a priority for me.
And for reasons that go beyond just waking up from sleep. While the failure to wake is an apt caption for this problem, the problem involves more severe consequences for me. When sleep doesn't work properly, it means you cannot count on having battery
power when you need it. It's inconvenient to spend a minute or two doing a hard reset and reloading programs then correcting any file corruption. But It's utterly hopeless to not have any battery power when there's no auxiliary power and you need your Surface
to work. If sleep doesn't work, there's no guarantee you'll have any battery power remaining when you try to wake the Surface.
Jay, your assertion that no one has tried the same image on different machines is not true. You asked about that earlier this month and I replied that I had done just that. I replied in detail about the process. On June 8th you posted that the hole in my
assertion was that I may have used a different downloaded image. I replied on June 8th that I used the same thumb drive with the same image, no new download, on all three machines.
The two older machines failed miserably within the first day on that image. The new lot 1613 machine has performed flawlessly, for over a month now, with that same image. I have no idea if any changes were made in production, or if I finally got lucky with
a good machine. Looking at this thread, you see a lot fewer people complaining about machines that are lot 1612 or later. That, of course, is anecdotal and not conclusive. It does bear consideration though. What I am convinced of, 100%, is that my first three
machines had some type of hardware flaw. My current machine seems to be free of that flaw. Hopefully, the flaw will not manifest in the future.