BOTTOM LINE: it's ridiculous to expect IT managers to modify server settings to get Surface to work. Surface should be the device to be modified. Most requests to modify a server will be met with, "You should have bought an iPad."
New devices come out all the time. Just because some work with an existing configuration doesn't mean that configuration should work with everything.
Back in the day when Blackberry was the only way to get secure remote e-mails, people made the same argument with ActiveSync: "Why should my IT staff have to enable or buy ActiveSync when Blackberry already has it working? Everyone should just be compatible
with the BES."
Same situation. We know the Surface RT client does work with Exchange servers (perhaps Exchange 2003 is an exception). Is the right solution for MS to patch a functional mail client, or for the IT staff in a company to make a single line change to ActiveSync
so it is Surface RT compatible?
Again, possible Exchange 2003 issues aside, this is a problem that could potentially be quickly fixed by opening an IT ticket, or (unfortunately) using a device that is "supported" by your IT department.
If anyone that has an open ticket with MS on the issue now can share what exactly MS found, and which version(s) of Exchange server and which policies it pertains to, I would appreciate it.
I think Microsoft would be the FIRST to say that Surface should work with any service that iPad, iPhone, Blackberry, Droid, etc. work flawlessly with. It's understandable there's bugs. Keeping my fingers crossed they will solve this soon. Stay tuned.